CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services · Michigan

Concept Tooling Systems, Inc

Grand Rapids, MI · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Concept Tooling Systems, Inc runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services workplace, earning a grade C.

Concept Tooling Systems, Inc: 0.0 TCR = 0% of CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Concept Tooling Systems, Inc safety composite

Concept Tooling Systems, Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Concept Tooling Systems, Inc held a steady TCR band

Concept Tooling Systems, Inc's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · Grand Rapids, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/5
  • PHOTO Hopkinton 228
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hopkinton 228 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Concept Tooling Systems, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Concept Tooling Systems, Inc averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Concept Tooling Systems, Inc TCR series: 2016=0 · 2019=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Concept Tooling Systems, Inc falls in its industry

181 CAD (computer-aided design) sy establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 5 CAD (computer-aided design) sy employers in Michigan.

Concept Tooling Systems, Inc (23 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Concept Tooling Systems, Inc
Concept Tooling Systems, Inc (23 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Concept Tooling Systems, Inc has fewer employees than the CAD (computer-aided design) systems inte median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · MI · Grand Rapids

181 CAD (computer-aided design) systems integration design services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 1,006 employers in Grand Rapids, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hopkinton 228 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US CO Aurora E Steamboat Ave (1666) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southboro 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Franklin 55 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms - MIS 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Casey Woodwyk, Inc. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE John Schuring, Jr. Company 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atwood Timber and Lumber 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHHG-GR BUTTERWORTH CA 9,012 FTE
CITY-NEAR SH Butterworth Hospital 7,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Saint Mary's Hospital-MH-MI 2,914 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steelcase - Grand Rapids / Kentwood 2,817 FTE
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Binghamton 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE V1-Chesapeake 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryerson - Jacksonville 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCUP 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.