Prepared foods (except frozen) merchant wholesalers · Florida

CONCHITA FOODS, Inc.

Medley, FL · ~108 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CONCHITA FOODS, Inc. runs at 255% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Prepared foods (except frozen) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

CONCHITA FOODS, Inc.: 5.6 TCR = 255% of Prepared foods (except frozen) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CONCHITA FOODS, Inc. safety composite

CONCHITA FOODS, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
C 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2017→2024

CONCHITA FOODS, Inc. injury rate improved

CONCHITA FOODS, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.2 from 7.2 in 2017 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.2 · 2018=12.9 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424490 · Medley, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 5.6 · 255% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #31/59
  • PHOTO LAKE CITY FL
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LAKE CITY FL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

CONCHITA FOODS, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CONCHITA FOODS, Inc. averages 5.6 TCR (255% of the Prepared foods (except frozen) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CONCHITA FOODS, Inc. TCR series: 2017=7.2 · 2018=12.9 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=6.1 · 2023=4 · 2024=4 · BLS 2.2

Where CONCHITA FOODS, Inc. falls in its industry

1,278 Prepared foods (except frozen) establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 59 Prepared foods (except frozen) employers in Florida.

CONCHITA FOODS, Inc. (108 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 6.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate CONCHITA FOODS, Inc.
CONCHITA FOODS, Inc. (108 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 6.0

CONCHITA FOODS, Inc. has more employees than the Prepared foods (except frozen) merchant median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 4.0 5 0 0
2023 4.0 3.2 5 0 0
2022 6.1 4.3 7 0 0
2021 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2020 7.1 5.4 4 4 0
2019 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2018 12.9 9.4 11 0 0
2017 7.2 6.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424490 · FL · Medley

1,278 Prepared foods (except frozen) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 108 employers in Medley, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LAKE CITY FL 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR LCCB 1L12 NEW WINDSOR NY DISTRIBUTION CTR 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coca - Cola Bottling Company High Country - Aberdeen 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 066 Clayton 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE PFM-Fort Myers Plant 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE London Bay Homes 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Property Renovations and Construction, LLC 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE AHS Residential 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR BEL USA, LLC 641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco South Florida 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR S04539 - WM of Dade County 446 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seaboard Marine LTD 412 FTE
NAT-TCR Zintl, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR MTS Marshall 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Physicians East- Endocrine 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE George Reed, Inc. Modesto Construction 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Continental Express Inc 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pennsylvania Coach - McKeesport 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Rapids 068 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.