Plug (i.e., floriculture products) growing · New York

Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc.

Jamesport, NY · ~81 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc. runs at 124% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Plug (i.e., floriculture products) growing workplace, earning a grade D.

Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc.: 5.6 TCR = 124% of Plug (i.e., floriculture products) growing BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc. safety composite

Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.1

2018→2024

Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc. injury rate improved

Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc.'s TCR fell 11.1 from 14.3 in 2018 to 3.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=14.3 · 2019=5.0 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 111422 · Jamesport, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 124% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO Bob's Market and Gre…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bob's Market and Greenhouses Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc. averages 5.6 TCR (124% of the Plug (i.e., floriculture products) growing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc. TCR series: 2018=14.3 · 2019=5 · 2020=3.9 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc. falls in its industry

166 Plug (i.e., floriculture produ establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Plug (i.e., floriculture produ employers in New York.

Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc. (81 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 5.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc.
Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc. (81 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 5.5

Van de Wetering Greenhouses, Inc. has more employees than the Plug (i.e., floriculture products) growi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2023 3.4 1.7 1 1 0
2022 3.3 3.3 2 0 0
2021 5.9 4.4 4 0 0
2020 3.9 1.3 2 1 0
2019 5.0 1.3 4 0 0
2018 14.3 6.0 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

111422 · NY · Jamesport

166 Plug (i.e., floriculture products) growing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bob's Market and Greenhouses Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edwards Greenhouse & Flowershop, LLC 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Masterpiece Flower Company LLC - Merchandising (MO) 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coldwater 5.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE HENRY CLAY BLVD (HCB1)-NY87 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE GREENVILLE 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Welkin Mechanical 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE 211-NY-Long Island Central 81 FTE
NAT-TCR Physicians East- Endocrine 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CONCHITA FOODS, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Stone Systems of New Jersey 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Dexter Fastener Technologies, Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bagby Electric of Virginia, LLC 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Catherine Kolnaski School 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phillips-Medisize, LLC - Metal Injection Molding 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Columbia TPO 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.