Employer
Concrete Form Erectors
Safety Grade
F
Avg TCR
7.6
per 100 workers
Inspections
8
years on record
Concrete form contractors · Tennessee
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Concrete Form Erectors

Open-data reference.

NASHVILLE, TN | Concrete form contractors

~118 avg employees | 8 years of OSHA data

F
Failing Safety Record
Avg TCR
7.6
per 100 workers/yr
Industry Avg TCR
2.8
BLS benchmark
Total Injuries
68
across all years
Fatalities
0
across all years

Concrete Form Erectors has an average TCR of 7.6, which is 270% of the industry average (2.8) for Concrete form contractors. This is significantly worse than average.

Safety Insights for Concrete Form Erectors

Concrete Form Erectors operates an establishment with approximately 118 full-time equivalent workers in NASHVILLE, TN, classified under the Concrete form contractors industry (NAICS 238190). Across 8 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 68 recordable injuries, 0 occupational illnesses, and 0 workplace fatalities. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 7.6 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the F letter grade (Failing Safety Record).

Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 2.8 for Concrete form contractors, Concrete Form Erectors's workforce experiences 270% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked — a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers — so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR above the benchmark flags a higher-than-typical risk profile for jobseekers, insurers, and enforcement agencies to examine.

Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 8 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Concrete Form Erectors as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 0, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries — there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Concrete Form Erectors's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source — name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor — OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 238190 — Concrete form contractors.

DART Rate — Transparent Calculation (2024)

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

3 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 233,266 hours worked = 2.57 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904 — OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context — Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Concrete Form Erectors (this establishment) 7.56 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 8-year avg
Cathodic protection, installation industry avg 2.80 BLS IIF, NAICS 238190
Tennessee state avg (all industries) 19.26 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics — Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Concrete Form Erectors to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) — inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.3 2.6 5 0 0
2023 9.4 8.3 9 0 0
2022 7.8 5.8 8 0 0
2021 4.4 3.3 4 0 0
2020 4.9 4.9 5 0 0
2019 4.8 4.8 6 0 0
2018 13.9 9.3 18 0 0
2017 11.1 6.0 13 0 0

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Concrete Form Erectors's safety grade?
Concrete Form Erectors has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 7.6 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 2.8 for Concrete form contractors.
How is the safety grade calculated?
Safety grades are calculated by comparing an employer's average Total Case Rate (TCR) — the number of workplace injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers per year — against the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) industry benchmark. Grade A means significantly below average injury rates; grade F means significantly above average.
How many injuries has Concrete Form Erectors reported?
Concrete Form Erectors has reported 68 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 8 years of OSHA data (2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
All safety data comes from OSHA's Injury Tracking Application (ITA), which collects mandatory establishment-level injury and illness reports from employers with 250+ employees or those in high-hazard industries. Industry benchmarks are from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program.

Explore More Safety Data

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Related

Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial