Rankings · OSHA ITA

Safety Rankings

Rankings of most dangerous and safest employers and industries based on OSHA injury data.

Data-driven rankings of US employers and industries by workplace injury and illness rates, derived from OSHA 300A annual summaries. All rankings use total case rate (TCR) per 100 full-time employees, benchmarked against industry averages.

Most Dangerous Employers
Highest injury rates among large employers, those whose TCR significantly exceeds their industry benchmark.
Safest Employers
Grade A employers with the lowest injury rates and strongest safety cultures, based on OSHA data.
Most Dangerous Industries
Industries with the highest average injury rates across all reporting employers in OSHA data.

Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) Rankings updated annually as new OSHA 300A data is released. Injury rates represent recordable incidents per 100 full-time workers

Top 10 Safest Large Employers

Grade A employers with the lowest total case rate (TCR) and at least 3 years of reported data.

  1. #1 Envision Printing, LLC GA · Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) · TCR 0.01
  2. #2 6894-68940034 IL · Human resource consulting services · TCR 0.01
  3. #3 Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC MO · Museums · TCR 0.01
  4. #4 Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 OH · Corporate offices · TCR 0.01
  5. #5 One Federal Street MA · TCR 0.01
  6. #6 City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services CA · Parks and recreation commission, government · TCR 0.01
  7. #7 Rogers Group, Inc TN · Road construction · TCR 0.01
  8. #8 Burrow Global Services, LLC TX · Engineering services · TCR 0.01
  9. #9 00525 NORTH TEMPLE OFFICE UT · Electric Services · TCR 0.01
  10. #10 Springhill Suites Houston Intercontinental AP TX · Hotels (except casino hotels) · TCR 0.01

Top 10 Most Dangerous Large Employers

Grade D or F employers with the highest total case rate (TCR) and at least 3 years of reported data.

  1. #1 Hillside Rehab & Care Center IL · Skilled nursing facilities · TCR 49.83 · Grade F
  2. #2 Evans WA · Homeless shelters · TCR 49.43 · Grade F
  3. #3 Accolade Healthcare of Paxton on Pells IL · Skilled nursing facilities · TCR 49.16 · Grade F
  4. #4 Detroit Detention Center MI · Correctional institutions · TCR 48.78 · Grade F
  5. #5 West View Healthy Living OH · Skilled Nursing · TCR 48.69 · Grade F
  6. #6 CA-MKLLC -California CA · Dinner theaters · TCR 48.23 · Grade F
  7. #7 Edgewood Brainerd Senior Living LLC MN · Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · TCR 47.96 · Grade F
  8. #8 Mystere Newco NV · Theatrical Producers · TCR 47.86 · Grade F
  9. #9 Twin City Framers MN · Carpentry, framing · TCR 47.84 · Grade F
  10. #10 St. Luke Lutheran Community - North Canton OH · Skilled nursing facilities · TCR 47.76 · Grade F

How PlainSafetyScore Rankings Are Compiled

Our rankings are computed directly from the upstream dataset, not editorially curated and not influenced by advertisers. Each ranking surfaces a clear, reproducible metric (for example, count of records per jurisdiction, share of records within a category, or rate per capita), and the underlying numbers are visible on the associated record pages so you can verify them. We recompute rankings whenever the upstream data refreshes, and we publish the refresh cadence on the methodology page.

What Rankings Mean (and What They Do Not)

A ranking is a useful lens, it tells you where to start looking, but it is not a judgment about quality, safety, or reputation. Being at the top of a count-based ranking typically reflects scale: more records in a jurisdiction, more entities in a category. It does not mean "better" or "worse." Whenever a ranking could be misread as a quality claim, we include an explanatory note on the page. When a ranking is rate-based (per capita, per thousand, share), we describe the denominator so you can sanity-check whether the normalization fits your question.

Why We Publish These Rankings

Rankings make large public datasets navigable. Most visitors arrive with a question ("Which jurisdiction has the most records?" or "Where is this category concentrated?") and benefit from seeing a ranked list with direct links to the full records. Publishing ranked views of public data is a long-established practice in civic journalism; we are careful to surface the raw numbers, link to the official source, and avoid editorial spin. If a ranking ever implies a value judgment not supported by the data, please email us at the address on the contact page and we will review the wording.

Methodology, Sources, and Corrections

Every ranking is derived from the source dataset linked on the methodology page. We do not blend proprietary signals; we do not substitute editor opinion for data. If you believe a ranking is miscomputed or that a record is misclassified, please contact us with the specific record ID and the expected correction, and we will investigate within the next refresh cycle. Corrections that affect the published ranking are rolled forward immediately; minor formatting fixes go out with the next scheduled refresh.