Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · Utah

Condie Construction Company

Springville, UT · ~59 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Condie Construction Company runs at 186% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Condie Construction Company: 5.2 TCR = 186% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Condie Construction Company safety composite

Condie Construction Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2019→2024

Condie Construction Company injury rate improved

Condie Construction Company's TCR fell 7.5 from 12.5 in 2019 to 5.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=12.5 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=5.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Springville, UT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 186% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #11/12
  • PHOTO E-Z Bel Construction
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: E-Z Bel Construction (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Condie Construction Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Condie Construction Company averages 5.2 TCR (186% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Condie Construction Company TCR series: 2019=12.5 · 2020=3.6 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=4 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Condie Construction Company falls in its industry

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Utah alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in Utah.

Condie Construction Company (59 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Condie Construction Company
Condie Construction Company (59 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Condie Construction Company has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 1.3 4 0 0
2023 4.0 0.0 3 0 0
2022 4.6 3.1 3 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2020 3.6 0.0 2 0 0
2019 12.5 5.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · UT · Springville

1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 40 employers in Springville, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR E-Z Bel Construction 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pace Contracting LLC 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR F. L. Showalter, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oscar Renda Contracting Inc.- Capers Ridge 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 105355 - TIC Blue Sky Carrying Job 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Landmark Excavating Inc 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE CR Solar LLC dba eEquals 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Post Consumer Brands SLC Distribution Center 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle Prepared Foods 1,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle Springville Factory 1,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR Innovative Labs 408 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3208 364 FTE
NAT-TCR Yingling Aviation LLC 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 215 Bridgeton 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wenger Feeds - Spring Glen Mill 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR FlavorSum, LLC 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Manteno 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE xcal tools clare 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Braham Area Elementary School 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.