Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation · Mississippi

Conditioned Air Inc

Tupelo, MS · ~57 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Conditioned Air Inc runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation workplace, earning a grade B.

Conditioned Air Inc: 2.0 TCR = 71% of Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Conditioned Air Inc safety composite

Conditioned Air Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2024

Conditioned Air Inc injury rate improved

Conditioned Air Inc's TCR fell 2.0 from 2.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=5.5 · 2021=1.3 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Tupelo, MS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/32
  • PHOTO RJ Mechanical Inc
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RJ Mechanical Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Conditioned Air Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Conditioned Air Inc averages 2.0 TCR (71% of the Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Conditioned Air Inc TCR series: 2016=2 · 2017=0 · 2018=5.5 · 2021=1.3 · 2023=3 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Conditioned Air Inc falls in its industry

5,793 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 32 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust employers in Mississippi.

Conditioned Air Inc (57 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Conditioned Air Inc
Conditioned Air Inc (57 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Conditioned Air Inc has fewer employees than the Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collectio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2021 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2018 5.5 3.7 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · MS · Tupelo

5,793 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 144 employers in Tupelo, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RJ Mechanical Inc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ahern Quad Cities 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Design Mechanical Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR S.A. Comunale - Harrisburg 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE TJ Beall Company 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rankin Network 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pine Belt Division Office 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Premium Waters Jackson 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Mississippi Medical Center 5,727 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tupelo Cooper Tire & Rubber Plant (SIC 3011) 1,416 FTE
CITY-NEAR JESCO, Inc. 394 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tupelo Operations 393 FTE
NAT-TCR Care New England Medical Group 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1764 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mesquite Svc Ct 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Smith & Nephew Columbia MD 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Early Childhood Education Center 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Magic Coil Products, LLC 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boger Concrete 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE ARP-118 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.