Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled spirits, wine), merchant wholesalers · Florida

Cone Distributing - Ocala

Ocala, FL · ~218 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cone Distributing - Ocala runs at 214% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled spirits, wine), merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Cone Distributing - Ocala: 4.7 TCR = 214% of Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled spirits, wine), merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cone Distributing - Ocala safety composite

Cone Distributing - Ocala scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
B 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2017→2018

Cone Distributing - Ocala injury rate improved

Cone Distributing - Ocala's TCR fell 3.2 from 6.3 in 2017 to 3.1 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.3 · 2018=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424810 · Ocala, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.7 · 214% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #16/35
  • PHOTO Craft Beer Guild Dis…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~218 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Craft Beer Guild Distributing of NY LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Cone Distributing - Ocala in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cone Distributing - Ocala averages 4.7 TCR (214% of the Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled spirits, wine), merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cone Distributing - Ocala TCR series: 2017=6.3 · 2018=3.1 · BLS 2.2

Where Cone Distributing - Ocala falls in its industry

664 Beverages, alcoholic (except d establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 35 Beverages, alcoholic (except d employers in Florida.

Cone Distributing - Ocala (218 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Cone Distributing - Ocala
Cone Distributing - Ocala (218 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 95 employees and a TCR of 6.4

Cone Distributing - Ocala has more employees than the Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled s median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.1 2.0 8 0 0
2017 6.3 6.3 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424810 · FL · Ocala

664 Beverages, alcoholic (except distilled spirits, wine), merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 391 employers in Ocala, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Craft Beer Guild Distributing of NY LLC 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anheuser-Busch Sales San Diego 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Distributing Company 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brewers Distributing Co. 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Condotte America LLC. 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE Refresco North American Head Office 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dometic Marine Division 218 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yellowfin Yachts 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR Home Health Ocala 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Florida Ocala Hospital 2,064 FTE
CITY-NEAR AdventHealth Ocala 1,722 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ocala Regional Medical Center 1,342 FTE
NAT-TCR Port Reading - PRD 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Northwest Community Healthcare Heart & Vascular Specialists 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 0188 - Saginaw, Mi 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 0768 - Palmdale, Ca 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Saginaw (Misag) 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2073-EJ-20730203-MX 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE BTD Manufacturing Dawsonville 218 FTE
NAT-SIZE Republic National Distributing Company 12 218 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.