General Warehousing and Storage · New Jersey

Port Reading - PRD

Port Reading, NJ · ~101 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Port Reading - PRD runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Warehousing and Storage workplace, earning a grade C.

Port Reading - PRD: 4.7 TCR = 81% of General Warehousing and Storage BLS 5.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Port Reading - PRD safety composite

Port Reading - PRD scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2018

Port Reading - PRD injury rate improved

Port Reading - PRD's TCR fell 2.3 from 6.6 in 2016 to 4.3 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.6 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.6 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Port Reading, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.7 · 81% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #219/333
  • PHOTO 30229 - CAPSTONE Kro…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~101 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 30229 - CAPSTONE Kroger Compton CA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Port Reading - PRD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Port Reading - PRD averages 4.7 TCR (81% of the General Warehousing and Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Port Reading - PRD TCR series: 2016=6.6 · 2017=3.3 · 2018=4.3 · BLS 5.8

Where Port Reading - PRD falls in its industry

9,477 General Warehousing and Storag establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #219 safest of 333 General Warehousing and Storag employers in New Jersey.

Port Reading - PRD (101 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Port Reading - PRD
Port Reading - PRD (101 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Port Reading - PRD has more employees than the General Warehousing and Storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.3 3.6 6 0 0
2017 3.3 2.5 4 0 0
2016 6.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · NJ · Port Reading

9,477 General Warehousing and Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 13 employers in Port Reading, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 30229 - CAPSTONE Kroger Compton CA 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westlake - 3011 Old Spanish Trail 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - ONT6 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HEA2 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Haworth, NJ 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Jersey American Water- Lawnside 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE OMNI Instrumentation Services 101 FTE
STATE-SIZE thyssenkrupp Elevator Corp Northern New Jersey 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bed Bath and Beyond Port Reading 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR Port Reading PR3 131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Port Reading PRD 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Panalpina NYLogistics 129 FTE
NAT-TCR 0188 - Saginaw, Mi 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 0768 - Palmdale, Ca 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Northwest Community Healthcare Heart & Vascular Specialists 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR All Seasonings Ingredients - Oneida, NY 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marietta Center 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE HH - Queens CSC 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE EC039 - Kansas City, KS-0300 101 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6400-Swy 0024 0015 101 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.