Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Ohio

Conesville Plant

Name: Conesville Plant Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Conesville, OH · ~191 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 2.1
Avg TCR: 1.2
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Conesville Plant runs at 177% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade D.

Conesville Plant: 2.1 TCR = 177% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Conesville Plant safety composite

Conesville Plant scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 2.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers
DART rate: C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2019

Conesville Plant injury rate improved

Conesville Plant's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Conesville, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.1 · 177% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #21/25
PHOTO 85A - Sioux Energy C…
BOOK 4y book
INJ 5 inj
SIZE ~191 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 85A - Sioux Energy Ctr Gen and Bud (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.1
85A - Sioux En

2.1
EW Brown Plant

2.1
AES Puerto Ric

2.1
New Harquahala

2.1

What this shows Conesville Plant averages 2.1 TCR (177% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Conesville Plant TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=2 · 2019=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Conesville Plant falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 25 Electric power generation, fos employers in Ohio.

Conesville Plant (191 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Conesville Plant has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2019	0.0	0.0	0	0
2018	2.0	0.0	0	4
2017	3.5	0.9	3	5
2016	3.0	0.4	2	6

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · OH · Conesville

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	85A - Sioux Energy Ctr Gen and Bud	WEST ALTON, MO	2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	EW Brown Plant	HARRODSBURG, KY	2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	AES Puerto Rico	GUAYAMA, PR	2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR	New Harquahala Generating Company	TONOPAH, AZ	2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE	103988 - Long Ridge Energy Generation	CLARINGTON	191 FTE
STATE-SIZE	All Construction	BRUNSWICK	191 FTE
STATE-SIZE	STANDARD REGISTER COLDWATER OH - 0220N	COLDWATER	191 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Amgen Inc (Ohio)	NEW ALBANY	191 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Conesville Industrial Park LLC	Conesville	39 FTE
NAT-TCR	DG Livonia	Livonia, MI	2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	6400-Swy 0005 2466	Laramie, WY	2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	The Mental Health Center - Colebrook	Colebrook, NH	2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR	3037 Keystone	Dubuque, IA	2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Meyer Corporation	Vallejo, CA	191 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Philips Fall River	Fall River, MA	191 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Cass Construction, Inc. dba Cass Arrieta	El Cajon, CA	191 FTE
NAT-SIZE	300 Commercial St	Malden, MA	191 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.