Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Illinois

ConGlobal Industries, Inc. Joliet

Joliet, IL · ~37 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ConGlobal Industries, Inc. Joliet runs at 199% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade D.

ConGlobal Industries, Inc. Joliet: 4.2 TCR = 199% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ConGlobal Industries, Inc. Joliet safety composite

ConGlobal Industries, Inc. Joliet scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.9

2016→2020

ConGlobal Industries, Inc. Joliet injury rate improved

ConGlobal Industries, Inc. Joliet's TCR fell 8.9 from 8.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.9 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.9 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Joliet, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.2 · 199% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #114/153
  • PHOTO 104 Arizona Fleet
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 104 Arizona Fleet (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

ConGlobal Industries, Inc. Joliet in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ConGlobal Industries, Inc. Joliet averages 4.2 TCR (199% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ConGlobal Industries, Inc. Joliet TCR series: 2016=8.9 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.1

Where ConGlobal Industries, Inc. Joliet falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 30% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #114 safest of 153 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Illinois.

ConGlobal Industries, Inc. Joliet (37 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate ConGlobal Industries, Inc. Joliet
ConGlobal Industries, Inc. Joliet (37 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

ConGlobal Industries, Inc. Joliet has fewer employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2018 5.2 2.6 2 0 0
2016 8.9 8.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · IL · Joliet

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 281 employers in Joliet, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 104 Arizona Fleet 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific Power Group - PGRF 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eastern Lift Truck Co., Inc. Br3 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ryder System, INC 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Curtis Orchard Ltd 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tuscola 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewis Seed Farms, Inc. - Ursa 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aurora Fleet Facility 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR County Of Will 2,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MDW2 2,361 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MDW2 2,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presence Saint Joseph Medical Center, Joliet 2,089 FTE
NAT-TCR Bird Incorporated dba CertainTeed Corporation 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR ReCon Houston Plant 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Brunswick at Attleboro 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Apex International - Chaska 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wedowee Live Haul 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Royal Industrial Solutions (PC1075) 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ram Tool Construction Supply Company - San Antonio 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE NurseCore of Denver 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.