Coal gasification at mine site · Alaska

ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine

Anchorage, AK · ~152 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
1.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Coal gasification at mine site workplace, earning a grade A.

ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine: 0.6 TCR = 29% of Coal gasification at mine site BLS 1.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine safety composite

ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine: 0.0 → 0.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine's TCR rose 0.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 211111 · Anchorage, AK AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Civitas Resources
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~152 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Civitas Resources (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alaska employers → · Look up another →

ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine averages 0.6 TCR (29% of the Coal gasification at mine site BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=0.6 · 2022=2 · 2023=0 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 1.9

Where ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine falls in its industry

225 Coal gasification at mine site establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alaska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Coal gasification at mine site employers in Alaska.

ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine (152 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 150 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine
ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine (152 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 150 employees and a TCR of 0.9

ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine has more employees than the Coal gasification at mine site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.0 0 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.0 2.0 1 2 0
2021 0.6 0.6 0 1 0
2020 1.1 1.1 0 2 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

211111 · AK · Anchorage

225 Coal gasification at mine site employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,558 rated employers in Alaska with headcount on file · 704 employers in Anchorage, AK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Civitas Resources 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Admiral Permian Resources 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caerus Operating LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Juan 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Charlie's Produce Anchorage 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2807-2955 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARCTEC Alaska 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dept. of Corrections (31) 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000198 4,453 FTE
CITY-NEAR AK10 PROVIDENCE ALASKA MEDICAL CTR-ANCHORAGE 2,864 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alaska Native Medical Center 2,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR GCI Communication Corp. 1,935 FTE
NAT-TCR Major Oak Power 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Seguin Engine Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. - Columbus 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Customer Service Group Carson City Velocity Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store #25 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kau Hospital 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE NSK Corp. Liberty, Indiana 152 FTE
NAT-SIZE PBI West Palm Beach Airport 152 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.