Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Texas

Major Oak Power

Bremond, TX · ~58 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Major Oak Power runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade A.

Major Oak Power: 0.6 TCR = 47% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Major Oak Power safety composite

Major Oak Power scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Major Oak Power held a steady TCR band

Major Oak Power's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Bremond, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/86
  • PHOTO EthosEnergy, Cosumne…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~58 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Major Oak Power in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Major Oak Power averages 0.6 TCR (47% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Major Oak Power TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Major Oak Power falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 86 Electric power generation, fos employers in Texas.

Major Oak Power (58 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Major Oak Power
Major Oak Power (58 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Major Oak Power has fewer employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.7 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 0 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · TX · Bremond

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 6 employers in Bremond, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EthosEnergy, Cosumnes Power Plant 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regulated Fossil Support 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mayo Fossil Plant 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRG Will County Generating Station 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cactus Feedyard 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flatonia Farm Plant 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waelder 2 Complex 58 FTE
STATE-SIZE Complex 1 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cattlemen 2 Solar 102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Performance Contractors, Inc. - Vistra Energy-Bremond 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR NAES : Major Oak Power 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bremond Nursing and Rehab Center 44 FTE
NAT-TCR ConocoPhillips Alaska - Alpine 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. - Columbus 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Customer Service Group Carson City Velocity Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pippin Wholesale Company 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Webster Machine Works LLC 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Residence Inn Boston Cambridge 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richmond RMD 58 FTE
NAT-SIZE N-TRAK Group, LLC 58 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.