Floor trusses, wood, manufacturing · South Carolina

Construction Components Truss Inman

Inman, SC · ~39 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Construction Components Truss Inman runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Floor trusses, wood, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Construction Components Truss Inman: 2.5 TCR = 75% of Floor trusses, wood, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Construction Components Truss Inman safety composite

Construction Components Truss Inman scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2017→2024

Construction Components Truss Inman injury rate improved

Construction Components Truss Inman's TCR fell 2.8 from 2.8 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.8 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321214 · Inman, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 75% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Case-Hill Group
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Case-Hill Group (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Construction Components Truss Inman in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Construction Components Truss Inman averages 2.5 TCR (75% of the Floor trusses, wood, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Construction Components Truss Inman TCR series: 2017=2.8 · 2018=2.6 · 2019=6.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=5.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Construction Components Truss Inman falls in its industry

421 Floor trusses, wood, manufactu establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Floor trusses, wood, manufactu employers in South Carolina.

Construction Components Truss Inman (39 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Construction Components Truss Inman
Construction Components Truss Inman (39 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0

Construction Components Truss Inman has fewer employees than the Floor trusses, wood, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.9 2.3 3 0 0
2018 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.8 2.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321214 · SC · Inman

421 Floor trusses, wood, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 29 employers in Inman, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Case-Hill Group 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR California TrusFrame, Sanger 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comtech 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CARTER COMPONENT PLANT 537 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Spartanburg Resource Center - PNG 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mid-Atlantic Insulation - South Carolina #759 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hawke Trailers, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hogan Construction - Greenville 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Enoree Complex 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mack Molding Company - Inman, SC 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAYBROOK PLANT 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR IWG High Performance Conductors - Inman 248 FTE
NAT-TCR Fox Metro Water Reclamation District 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR S03092 - Homer Hauling 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Northland Electrical Services 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Foundation - H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roseau County Courthouse 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE HM Clause - Immokalee Research Station 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Stough Group, Inc. 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.