Cotton ginning machinery manufacturing · California

HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc.

Clovis, CA · ~24 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cotton ginning machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc.: 2.5 TCR = 75% of Cotton ginning machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. safety composite

HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.3

2017→2024

HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. injury rate improved

HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc.'s TCR fell 8.3 from 8.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=11.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333111 · Clovis, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 75% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/45
  • PHOTO Moses Gin, Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Moses Gin, Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. averages 2.5 TCR (75% of the Cotton ginning machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. TCR series: 2017=8.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=11.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. falls in its industry

433 Cotton ginning machinery manuf establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 45 Cotton ginning machinery manuf employers in California.

HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc.
HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 82 employees and a TCR of 5.2

HWJ Designs for Agribusiness, Inc. has fewer employees than the Cotton ginning machinery manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 11.5 11.5 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 8.3 8.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333111 · CA · Clovis

433 Cotton ginning machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 125 employers in Clovis, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Moses Gin, Inc 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR John Deere Seeding Group 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quality Manufacturing Corporation 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mahindra USA 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Agro-Jal Farming Enterprises 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE MTD Farms 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marc Pura Ranch, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Costa Farms 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clovis Community Medical Ctr 2,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alorica - Clovis 687 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Clovis 668 FTE
CITY-NEAR Enhanced Landscape Management 510 FTE
NAT-TCR Fox Metro Water Reclamation District 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Construction Components Truss Inman 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR S03092 - Homer Hauling 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR P&C Construction 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vortex Colorado - SLC 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pentagon Plumbing 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pecos Construction Center 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mid-America Machine, Inc. 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.