Institutional building construction general contractors · California

Construction Division

Los Angeles, CA · ~169 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Construction Division runs at 126% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Institutional building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade D.

Construction Division: 3.7 TCR = 126% of Institutional building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Construction Division safety composite

Construction Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Construction Division: 3.7 → 4.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 10.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2024

Construction Division's TCR rose 0.4 from 3.7 in 2017 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 3.7 · 126% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #321/486
  • PHOTO Fire Research Corp
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~169 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fire Research Corp (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Construction Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Construction Division averages 3.7 TCR (126% of the Institutional building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Construction Division TCR series: 2017=3.7 · 2018=3.4 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=10.5 · 2021=1 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 2.9

Where Construction Division falls in its industry

4,692 Institutional building constru establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #321 safest of 486 Institutional building constru employers in California.

Construction Division (169 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Construction Division
Construction Division (169 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Construction Division has more employees than the Institutional building construction gene median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 4.1 5 0 0
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 2 0 0
2021 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2020 10.5 10.5 2 17 0
2019 3.9 1.9 6 2 0
2018 3.4 2.7 5 0 0
2017 3.7 3.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Los Angeles

4,692 Institutional building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fire Research Corp 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rue La La Inc 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LUNDY CONSTRUCTION 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4675_10941 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Adam Gutierrez 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE E & C LABOR SERVICES INC 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE MALAGA SHIPPING 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-South Harvesting, Inc. 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Monument Hill Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilton Charlotte Center City 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin Middle School 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR GoodClean - MM 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Post 53 - Emergency Medical Services 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE 18RM 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston HOU 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schenker Inc. (P&G- Browns Summit 169 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.