Powder metallurgy products manufactured on a job or order basis · Pennsylvania
Contact Technologies
St. Marys, PA · ~146 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 5.2
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Contact Technologies runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Powder metallurgy products manufactured on a job or order basis workplace, earning a grade D.
- D
- Poor Safety Record
- 5.2
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 20
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Contact Technologies's OSHA Total Case Rate of 5.2 to the Powder metallurgy products manufactured on a job or order basis BLS benchmark of 3.3 (156% of benchmark) across 3 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Contact Technologies's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Contact Technologies falls in its industry
162 Powder metallurgy products man establishmentsSafer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.
Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 62 Powder metallurgy products man employers in Pennsylvania.
Trend analysis for Contact Technologies
Between 2016 and 2024, Contact Technologies's Total Case Rate improved from 6.4 to 4.6 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 28% decrease across 8 years of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2022, at a TCR of 4.5, while 2016 saw the highest rate, at 6.4, a spread of 1.9 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 3 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 3 reporting years, Contact Technologies recorded 20 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 3-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 20 injuries shown on this page for Contact Technologies are sourced from its own 3 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 332117 - Powder metallurgy products manufactured on a job or order basis.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
3 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 261,594 hours worked = 2.29 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Contact Technologies (this establishment) | 5.16 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 3-year avg |
| Powder metallurgy products manufactured on a job or order basis industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 332117 |
| Pennsylvania state avg (all industries) | 5.06 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Contact Technologies to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 6 reportable incidents · 6 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2022: 5 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 9 reportable incidents · 9 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4.6 | 2.3 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 4.5 | 3.6 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6.4 | 1.4 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Contact Technologies's reported OSHA injury record versus its Powder metallurgy products manufactured on a job or order basis peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 156% of the Powder metallurgy products manufactured on a job or order basis benchmark, Contact Technologies reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Powder metallurgy products manufactured on a job or order basis sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Contact Technologies's safety grade?
How many injuries has Contact Technologies reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Pennsylvania, and by nearby establishments in St. Marys - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~5.2)
Similar size (~146 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.