Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building · New Jersey

Conti Federal Services, Inc.

Edison, NJ · ~22 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Conti Federal Services, Inc. runs at 33% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade A.

Conti Federal Services, Inc.: 0.9 TCR = 33% of Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Conti Federal Services, Inc. safety composite

Conti Federal Services, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Conti Federal Services, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Conti Federal Services, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Edison, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 33% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/66
  • PHOTO TCCo-DEN
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TCCo-DEN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Conti Federal Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Conti Federal Services, Inc. averages 0.9 TCR (33% of the Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Conti Federal Services, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Conti Federal Services, Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 66 Addition, alteration and renov employers in New Jersey.

Conti Federal Services, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Conti Federal Services, Inc.
Conti Federal Services, Inc. (22 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Conti Federal Services, Inc. has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation gene median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NJ · Edison

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation general contractors, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 227 employers in Edison, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TCCo-DEN 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aladdin Construction Co., Inc. 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR FCL Builders Arizona, LLC 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Quadrangle Redevelopment #2121 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE America's Grow-A-Row Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE NAES : Red Oak Power 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woodbridge Energy Center 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eagle Point Power Generation, LLC 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR JFK MEDICAL CENTER 3,904 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anthony M Yalensics / JFK 3,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGA9 2,966 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LGA9 2,437 FTE
NAT-TCR Gas Field Specialist - 3 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Boaty's Transport Inc 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 100 Sonwil 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Still 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hovingh Concrete Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tft #595 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tft #562 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Humphreys Farmers Cooperative 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.