Calipers, brake, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · North Carolina

Continental Automotive Systems

Fletcher, NC · ~610 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Continental Automotive Systems runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Calipers, brake, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Continental Automotive Systems: 4.1 TCR = 76% of Calipers, brake, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Continental Automotive Systems safety composite

Continental Automotive Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2018→2021

Continental Automotive Systems injury rate improved

Continental Automotive Systems's TCR fell 1.0 from 3.9 in 2018 to 2.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.9 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336340 · Fletcher, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.1 · 76% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #5/8
  • PHOTO Tramec Sloan Galion
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 96 inj
  • SIZE ~610 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tramec Sloan Galion (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Continental Automotive Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Continental Automotive Systems averages 4.1 TCR (76% of the Calipers, brake, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Continental Automotive Systems TCR series: 2018=3.9 · 2019=4.7 · 2020=4.9 · 2021=2.9 · BLS 5.4

Where Continental Automotive Systems falls in its industry

133 Calipers, brake, automotive, t establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 8 Calipers, brake, automotive, t employers in North Carolina.

Continental Automotive Systems (610 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 150 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Continental Automotive Systems
Continental Automotive Systems (610 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 150 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Continental Automotive Systems has more employees than the Calipers, brake, automotive, truck, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 2.9 2.4 11 0 0
2020 4.9 3.9 23 1 0
2019 4.7 3.8 31 3 0
2018 3.9 2.5 31 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336340 · NC · Fletcher

133 Calipers, brake, automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 52 employers in Fletcher, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tramec Sloan Galion 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Webb Wheel Products Inc 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR HCF 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Continental Automotive Systems - Culpeper Facility 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lincolnton 608 FTE
STATE-SIZE John Deere Turf Care 612 FTE
STATE-SIZE FAYETTEVILLE PDCA 608 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kewaunee Scientific Corporation 608 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meritor Fletcher 622 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wilsonart LLC 613 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wilsonart Fletcher NC 581 FTE
CITY-NEAR BorgWarner Thermal Fletcher Plant 308 FTE
NAT-TCR Kirkland Millwork 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR HTI-California 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Netcom Technologies Inc 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lila Doyle Hospital 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Silverwood Theme Park 610 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : DTW - Detroit 610 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kansas City Headquarters 1KC 610 FTE
NAT-SIZE Us Foods Port Orange 610 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.