Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing · California

Continental Coatings Fontana

Fontana, CA · ~27 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Continental Coatings Fontana runs at 282% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Continental Coatings Fontana: 9.3 TCR = 282% of Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Continental Coatings Fontana safety composite

Continental Coatings Fontana scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Continental Coatings Fontana held a steady TCR band

Continental Coatings Fontana's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 31.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=31.8 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=10.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325510 · Fontana, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 282% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #29/29
  • PHOTO Tabco
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tabco (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Continental Coatings Fontana in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Continental Coatings Fontana averages 9.3 TCR (282% of the Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Continental Coatings Fontana TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=31.8 · 2021=4 · 2022=10.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Continental Coatings Fontana falls in its industry

530 Industrial product finishes an establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 29 Industrial product finishes an employers in California.

Continental Coatings Fontana (27 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Continental Coatings Fontana
Continental Coatings Fontana (27 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Continental Coatings Fontana has fewer employees than the Industrial product finishes and coatings median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 10.7 10.7 3 0 0
2021 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2020 31.8 31.8 0 7 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325510 · CA · Fontana

530 Industrial product finishes and coatings (i.e., paint) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 363 employers in Fontana, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tabco 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bull-Bond Mfg Corp 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA IL Chicago Exchange Plant 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Architectural & Industrial Metal Finishing Co., LLC 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE HQ 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medeiros Farms Vineyards 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE SAND RANCH 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Bernabe Vineyards 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LAX9 2,844 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LAX9 2,645 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08880314 FONTANA MEDICAL CENTER 2,635 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-08180314 2,236 FTE
NAT-TCR Asheville NC FXFE-AVL 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Marietta Mister Sparky Electric 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 2868 - Richmond Grand Pkwy SW 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Whitestone Construction Services, Inc. 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE KS Liberal 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quincy 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insituform Technologies LLC - Medley 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4198 Eagle Hill Road High Point NC 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.