Automobile proving and testing grounds · Texas

Continental Tire Uvalde Proving Grounds

Uvalde, TX · ~55 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Continental Tire Uvalde Proving Grounds runs at 382% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Automobile proving and testing grounds workplace, earning a grade F.

Continental Tire Uvalde Proving Grounds: 1.9 TCR = 382% of Automobile proving and testing grounds BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Continental Tire Uvalde Proving Grounds safety composite

Continental Tire Uvalde Proving Grounds scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Continental Tire Uvalde Proving Grounds: 0.0 → 5.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 5.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.2× in 2020

Continental Tire Uvalde Proving Grounds's TCR rose 5.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 5.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541380 · Uvalde, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.9 · 382% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #23/31
  • PHOTO PASC OSHA 300 Form P…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PASC OSHA 300 Form Princeton, NJ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Continental Tire Uvalde Proving Grounds in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Continental Tire Uvalde Proving Grounds averages 1.9 TCR (382% of the Automobile proving and testing grounds BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Continental Tire Uvalde Proving Grounds TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2020=5.7 · BLS 0.5

Where Continental Tire Uvalde Proving Grounds falls in its industry

232 Automobile proving and testing establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 31 Automobile proving and testing employers in Texas.

Continental Tire Uvalde Proving Grounds (55 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Continental Tire Uvalde Proving Grounds
Continental Tire Uvalde Proving Grounds (55 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0

Continental Tire Uvalde Proving Grounds has fewer employees than the Automobile proving and testing grounds median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 5.7 2.3 5 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541380 · TX · Uvalde

232 Automobile proving and testing grounds employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 23 employers in Uvalde, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PASC OSHA 300 Form Princeton, NJ 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Andover Research and Development 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westpak Inc 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CHAMPION FEEDERS 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE SANTA GERTRUDIS 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWISHER COUNTY CATTLE COMPANY 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harwood Complex 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 782 282 FTE
CITY-NEAR 782 272 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lopez Health Systems, Inc.-Uvalde Branch Office 185 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amistad Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 123 FTE
NAT-TCR Ross store 543 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 679 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : ILM - Wilmington 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Tmx2440 - Sarasota 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #6508 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Systems Plant Services, Inc.- Columbus, MS SDI 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ross store 7 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE 7811-Enphg-Allstate North Plaza 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.