Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services · California

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab

Fresno, CA · ~72 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab runs at 374% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services workplace, earning a grade F.

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab: 1.9 TCR = 374% of Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab safety composite

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 1.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab: 0.0 → 1.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.71× in 2020

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab's TCR rose 1.3 from 0.0 in 2017 to 1.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541380 · Fresno, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 1.9 · 374% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #22/35
  • PHOTO Westpak Inc
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Westpak Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab averages 1.9 TCR (374% of the Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=1.3 · BLS 0.5

Where Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab falls in its industry

232 Laboratory testing (except med establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 35 Laboratory testing (except med employers in California.

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab (72 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab
Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab (72 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0

Food Safety Net Services, Ltd. - Fresno Lab has fewer employees than the Laboratory testing (except medical, vete median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2019 6.2 0.0 4 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541380 · CA · Fresno

232 Laboratory testing (except medical, veterinary) services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 981 employers in Fresno, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Westpak Inc 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primera - Cranbury 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Andover Research and Development 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Twining, Inc. Laboratory 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monterey Pacific, LLC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arts Ranch 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mellano & Company - Los Angeles Wholesale House 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greg Hooker dba Diamond H Dairy 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Fresno 7,553 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ag Force LLC 6,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Ctr 5,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Regional Medical Center 4,921 FTE
NAT-TCR Fisher-Titus Health 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Health Care Facilities Maintenance, LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Waters of White Hall 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mercy Health VNS MSK 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2573-FL055 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Police Dept 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas - Huntsville - 07-H 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prospect Park Zoo 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.