Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Ohio

Continuing Healthcare at Adams Lane

Zanesville, OH · ~113 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
30.6
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Continuing Healthcare at Adams Lane runs at 471% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade F.

Continuing Healthcare at Adams Lane: 30.6 TCR = 471% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Continuing Healthcare at Adams Lane safety composite

Continuing Healthcare at Adams Lane scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 30.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 33.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Continuing Healthcare at Adams Lane: 18.5 → 42.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 42.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.1× in 2020

Continuing Healthcare at Adams Lane's TCR rose 24.2 from 18.5 in 2019 to 42.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Zanesville, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 30.6 · 471% of ind

  • DART 33.7 DART
  • RANK #1074/1074
  • PHOTO Andover Manor Rehab …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Andover Manor Rehab and Nursing (0.6 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Continuing Healthcare at Adams Lane in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Continuing Healthcare at Adams Lane averages 30.6 TCR (471% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Continuing Healthcare at Adams Lane TCR series: 2019=18.5 · 2020=42.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Continuing Healthcare at Adams Lane falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1074 safest of 1074 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Ohio.

Continuing Healthcare at Adams Lane (113 employees, TCR 30.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Continuing Healthcare at Adams Lane
Continuing Healthcare at Adams Lane (113 employees, TCR 30.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Continuing Healthcare at Adams Lane has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 42.7 33.7 3 35 0
2019 18.5 15.0 14 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Zanesville

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 139 employers in Zanesville, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Andover Manor Rehab and Nursing 30.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Shook Home 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 226_338 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9288-752 29.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc. 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE TEN SIXTY LOGISTICS LLC D/B/A 1060 LOGISTICS LLC 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Lakes of Monclova 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Laurels of Mt Vernon 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Genesis HealthCare Systems 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Genesis HealthCare System 3,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zanesville DC 833 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0047-HES Zanesville 676 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0100- Corp Office/RM/DM 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seabrook Terminal 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northlake Care Center 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE BAE Systems, Inc. SJC 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.