Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing · Ohio

E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc.

Wooster, OH · ~113 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc. runs at 690% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc.: 22.8 TCR = 690% of Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc. safety composite

E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−30.2

2016→2022

E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc. injury rate improved

E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc.'s TCR fell 30.2 from 41.7 in 2016 to 11.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 41.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=41.7 · 2017=23.7 · 2018=28.1 · 2019=26.3 · 2020=12.8 · 2021=15.2 · 2022=11.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332439 · Wooster, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 22.8 · 690% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #21/21
  • PHOTO McShane Welding Co
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 178 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: McShane Welding Co (2.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc. averages 22.8 TCR (690% of the Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc. TCR series: 2016=41.7 · 2017=23.7 · 2018=28.1 · 2019=26.3 · 2020=12.8 · 2021=15.2 · 2022=11.5 · BLS 3.3

Where E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc. falls in its industry

175 Containers, light gauge metal establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 21 Containers, light gauge metal employers in Ohio.

E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc. (113 employees, TCR 22.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc.
E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc. (113 employees, TCR 22.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.7

E-Pak Manufacturing, Llc. has more employees than the Containers, light gauge metal (except ca median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.5 4.1 17 0 0
2021 15.2 10.7 17 0 0
2020 12.8 6.4 16 0 0
2019 26.3 14.9 37 0 0
2018 28.1 7.8 36 0 0
2017 23.7 11.9 24 0 0
2016 41.7 26.9 31 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332439 · OH · Wooster

175 Containers, light gauge metal (except cans), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 133 employers in Wooster, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR McShane Welding Co 24.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Material Handling Equipment LLC 18.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conco, Inc. 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Custom Container Solutions, LLC 27.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hillandale Farms Ohio LLC 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Premium Building Products 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Triton Services 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kirk Williams Company 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scaheffler Transmissions LLC 1,907 FTE
CITY-NEAR LuK USA LLC 1,814 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schaeffler Transmission LLC 1,662 FTE
CITY-NEAR College of Wooster 771 FTE
NAT-TCR 6458-ZSMA 22.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-EA-ABI-ABILENE-ABI-TRML 22.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hoquiam Plywood Products 22.8 TCR
NAT-TCR La Crescenta Healthcare Center 22.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sacramento NorCal Kenworth 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gowanus Substation 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE CATCO 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gainesville Health & Rehab Center 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.