Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication · Ohio

Contractors Materials Company

Cincinnati, OH · ~72 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Contractors Materials Company runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication workplace, earning a grade D.

Contractors Materials Company: 4.9 TCR = 149% of Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Contractors Materials Company safety composite

Contractors Materials Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Contractors Materials Company: 5.0 → 5.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 10.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.1× in 2021

Contractors Materials Company's TCR rose 0.4 from 5.0 in 2016 to 5.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 10.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Cincinnati, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 149% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #39/81
  • PHOTO K & K Fabrication
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: K & K Fabrication (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Contractors Materials Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Contractors Materials Company averages 4.9 TCR (149% of the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Contractors Materials Company TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=10.3 · 2021=5.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Contractors Materials Company falls in its industry

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 81 Concrete reinforcing bar (reba employers in Ohio.

Contractors Materials Company (72 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Contractors Materials Company
Contractors Materials Company (72 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Contractors Materials Company has more employees than the Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assembl median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 5.4 5.4 4 0 0
2020 10.3 6.8 6 0 0
2019 3.9 3.9 3 0 0
2018 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 2 0 0
2016 5.0 5.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · OH · Cincinnati

1,491 Concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) assemblies, fabrication employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR K & K Fabrication 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CellXion - Building Pole Facility 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nucor Harris Rebar South LLC - Orlando Florida 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blast Cleaning Technologies 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE 300A 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Simonson Construction Services, Inc. 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE GB Fabrication 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Danbert, Inc. 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Whirlpool (WC USX WGA) 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 233321-Fwa-Oxon Hill Sta 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Empire Cheese Inc. 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Roadrunner Transportation Services - Nashville 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beverly Services LLC 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glasgow Health and Rehabilitation Center 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE NAPA Stevens Point Distribution Center 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.