Athletic goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing · California

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.

Poway, CA · ~72 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. runs at 177% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Athletic goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.: 5.8 TCR = 177% of Athletic goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. safety composite

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.: 6.6 → 7.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 7.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.3× in 2021

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.0 from 6.6 in 2017 to 7.6 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339920 · Poway, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 177% of ind

  • DART 7.6 DART
  • RANK #18/22
  • PHOTO LSI - Aquatix
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LSI - Aquatix (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. averages 5.8 TCR (177% of the Athletic goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. TCR series: 2017=6.6 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=7.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. falls in its industry

197 Athletic goods (except ammunit establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 22 Athletic goods (except ammunit employers in California.

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. (72 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc.
Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. (72 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. has fewer employees than the Athletic goods (except ammunition, cloth median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 7.6 7.6 5 0 0
2020 4.3 2.8 3 0 0
2019 4.2 4.2 3 0 0
2018 6.5 6.5 5 0 0
2017 6.6 6.6 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339920 · CA · Poway

197 Athletic goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 143 employers in Poway, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LSI - Aquatix 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bear Archery, Inc. dba Escalade Sports 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Johnson Health Tech North America Manufacturing 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FOX CORPORATE 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monterey Pacific, LLC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arts Ranch 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mellano & Company - Los Angeles Wholesale House 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greg Hooker dba Diamond H Dairy 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc. - Poway Campus 4,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR Geneal Atomics Facilities and Support Groups 1,169 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palomar Medical Center Poway 889 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics - Poway - A15 661 FTE
NAT-TCR Ac - Cs S 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR LP Lexington Park, LLC-- Chesapeake Shores 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Manufacturing 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Springfield, OH (WC USX MED) 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Glasgow Health and Rehabilitation Center 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Contractors Materials Company 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE NAPA Stevens Point Distribution Center 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE NMC - Blaine North Clinic -Urgent Care 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.