Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwave ovens, ovens, ranges), commercial-type, manufacturing · Oklahoma

Cookshack

Ponca City, OK · ~36 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cookshack runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwave ovens, ovens, ranges), commercial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Cookshack: 4.4 TCR = 133% of Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwave ovens, ovens, ranges), commercial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cookshack safety composite

Cookshack scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Cookshack: 0.0 → 9.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 9.5 TCR · DART/TCR 2.13× in 2024

Cookshack's TCR rose 9.3 from 0.0 in 2017 to 9.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333318 · Ponca City, OK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.4 · 133% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #11/12
  • PHOTO R.W. Martin & Sons, …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: R.W. Martin & Sons, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Cookshack in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cookshack averages 4.4 TCR (133% of the Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwave ovens, ovens, ranges), commercial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cookshack TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=9.5 · 2024=9.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Cookshack falls in its industry

361 Cooking equipment (i.e., fryer establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Cooking equipment (i.e., fryer employers in Oklahoma.

Cookshack (36 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Cookshack
Cookshack (36 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 77 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Cookshack has fewer employees than the Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.3 9.3 2 0 0
2023 9.5 0.0 2 0 0
2022 4.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333318 · OK · Ponca City

361 Cooking equipment (i.e., fryers, microwave ovens, ovens, ranges), commercial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 57 employers in Ponca City, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR R.W. Martin & Sons, Inc 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midwest Finishing Systems 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Veolia WTS Services USA, Inc. - Fontana Service Center 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR EcoWater Systems LLC - Ripley, MS 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sesaco 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Champion Feeders LLC dba Henry C Feedyard 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilson Area Office 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tenaska Kiamichi Generating Station 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dorada Foods 724 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ponca City Refinery 658 FTE
CITY-NEAR 823 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 823 348 FTE
NAT-TCR Clearwater Composites LLC 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 13811 Del Sur St. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Mates Inc 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR GCID 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Moulded Pulp, a division of Cascades Holding, Inc. 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE AC Cleveland Beachwood 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Sebeka 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maryland Metals Processing Inc. 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.