Ammunition (except sporting) merchant wholesalers · Maryland

Maryland Metals Processing Inc.

Baltimore, MD · ~36 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Maryland Metals Processing Inc. runs at 205% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ammunition (except sporting) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Maryland Metals Processing Inc.: 4.5 TCR = 205% of Ammunition (except sporting) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Maryland Metals Processing Inc. safety composite

Maryland Metals Processing Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2018→2024

Maryland Metals Processing Inc. injury rate improved

Maryland Metals Processing Inc.'s TCR fell 4.8 from 7.5 in 2018 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 9.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=7.5 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423990 · Baltimore, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 4.5 · 205% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK P37
  • PHOTO K-2 Industries, Inc.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: K-2 Industries, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Maryland Metals Processing Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Maryland Metals Processing Inc. averages 4.5 TCR (205% of the Ammunition (except sporting) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Maryland Metals Processing Inc. TCR series: 2018=7.5 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 2.2

Where Maryland Metals Processing Inc. falls in its industry

322 Ammunition (except sporting) m establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Maryland Metals Processing Inc. (36 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Maryland Metals Processing Inc.
Maryland Metals Processing Inc. (36 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Maryland Metals Processing Inc. has fewer employees than the Ammunition (except sporting) merchant wh median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2023 9.6 9.6 4 0 0
2022 4.5 4.5 2 0 0
2021 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2020 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2019 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2018 7.5 5.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423990 · MD · Baltimore

322 Ammunition (except sporting) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR K-2 Industries, Inc. 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acme United Corp FAO Vancouver, WA 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saint Gobain Abrasives Travelers Rest SC 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Modern Kitchens of Syracuse 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE ForwardGro, LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.W. Sauder Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gibraltar Construction Co., Inc. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE BOB BREEDING GENERAL CONTRACTORS, LLC 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Rocky Mount NC 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bluebonnet Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Brenham Service Center 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Beauty 21 Cosmetics 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR George Reed, Inc. Modesto Construction 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pro-Tec Division 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Sebeka 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cookshack 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moulded Pulp, a division of Cascades Holding, Inc. 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.