Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Massachusetts

Coolidge Road

Danvers, MA · ~30 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coolidge Road runs at 127% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Coolidge Road: 4.8 TCR = 127% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coolidge Road safety composite

Coolidge Road scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Coolidge Road: 0.0 → 9.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 9.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2019

Coolidge Road's TCR rose 9.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 9.4 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Danvers, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 127% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #17/45
  • PHOTO Houston Food Bank
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Houston Food Bank (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Coolidge Road in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coolidge Road averages 4.8 TCR (127% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Coolidge Road TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=9.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Coolidge Road falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 45 Activity centers for disabled employers in Massachusetts.

Coolidge Road (30 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Coolidge Road
Coolidge Road (30 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Coolidge Road has fewer employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 9.4 4.7 2 0 0
2018 5.1 5.1 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · MA · Danvers

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 119 employers in Danvers, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Houston Food Bank 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Options Camp Hill PA 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Saunders 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Curry Senior Center 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Best Bees Company 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Wareham 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kneeland 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Lagasse Group, LLC 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Abiomed, Inc. (Danvers HQ) 1,915 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northeast Arc 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medtronic-CVG 964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Millipore Sigma 17 Cherry Hill Drive Danvers 943 FTE
NAT-TCR Miami (HR) 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rupley Elementary School 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR All-Phase Electric Supply (Pc4169) 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rancho Nuevo Harvesting, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE CI Hamburg Superstore Lounge, LLC 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pete Moore Hospice House 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schumacher Electric Corporation - Hoopeston 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hayes Industries 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.