Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Massachusetts

Northeast Arc

Danvers, MA · ~1,016 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Northeast Arc runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Northeast Arc: 2.3 TCR = 62% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Northeast Arc safety composite

Northeast Arc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2019→2024

Northeast Arc injury rate improved

Northeast Arc's TCR fell 1.5 from 3.6 in 2019 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.6 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Danvers, MA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 2.3 · 62% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #6/45
  • PHOTO Schererville
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 85 inj
  • SIZE ~1,016 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Schererville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Northeast Arc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Northeast Arc averages 2.3 TCR (62% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Northeast Arc TCR series: 2019=3.6 · 2021=2 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Northeast Arc falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 45 Activity centers for disabled employers in Massachusetts.

Northeast Arc (1,016 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Northeast Arc
Northeast Arc (1,016 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Northeast Arc has more employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 1.7 16 0 0
2023 2.5 1.6 17 2 0
2022 1.5 1.5 10 0 0
2021 2.0 2.0 15 0 0
2019 3.6 2.3 27 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · MA · Danvers

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 119 employers in Danvers, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Schererville 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Selinsgrove - Susquehanna Trail 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1102 12th Street 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Divine House Inc. - Willmar 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE MAVAR1 1,021 FTE
STATE-SIZE AbbVie Bioresearch Center 1,005 FTE
STATE-SIZE Woburn Marshalls Distribution Center 1,029 FTE
STATE-SIZE Maestro-Connections VNA 1,002 FTE
CITY-NEAR Abiomed, Inc. (Danvers HQ) 1,915 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medtronic-CVG 964 FTE
CITY-NEAR Millipore Sigma 17 Cherry Hill Drive Danvers 943 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABIOMED INC 882 FTE
NAT-TCR Garcy Manufacturing 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Thompson Austin 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Select Tissue LLC 2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kyocera SLD Laser Inc 2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Liquid Environmental Solutions of Texas, LLC 1,016 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maple Grove Hospital 1,016 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mitsubishi Logisnextamericas (Houston) 1,016 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morton Processing Plant 1,016 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.