Environmental testing laboratories or services · Michigan

Cooper Standard Auburn Hills South

Auburn Hills, MI · ~374 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cooper Standard Auburn Hills South runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Environmental testing laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade A.

Cooper Standard Auburn Hills South: 0.2 TCR = 42% of Environmental testing laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cooper Standard Auburn Hills South safety composite

Cooper Standard Auburn Hills South scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2020

Cooper Standard Auburn Hills South injury rate improved

Cooper Standard Auburn Hills South's TCR fell 0.6 from 0.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.6 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541380 · Auburn Hills, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/31
  • PHOTO DDL-MN
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~374 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DDL-MN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Cooper Standard Auburn Hills South in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cooper Standard Auburn Hills South averages 0.2 TCR (42% of the Environmental testing laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cooper Standard Auburn Hills South TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2018=0.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Cooper Standard Auburn Hills South falls in its industry

232 Environmental testing laborato establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 31 Environmental testing laborato employers in Michigan.

Cooper Standard Auburn Hills South (374 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Cooper Standard Auburn Hills South
Cooper Standard Auburn Hills South (374 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 81 employees and a TCR of 1.0

Cooper Standard Auburn Hills South has more employees than the Environmental testing laboratories or se median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2016 0.6 0.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541380 · MI · Auburn Hills

232 Environmental testing laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 215 employers in Auburn Hills, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DDL-MN 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Momenta Cambridge 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westford MA 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CTS Phoenix 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Johnson Technology, Inc. - Norton 374 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eby-Brown Detroit 374 FTE
STATE-SIZE Litehouse Inc. - Lowell 373 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bell's Brewery 373 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology Center 14,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR FCA US Headquarters and Technology 12,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Continental - Auburn Hills North 1,318 FTE
CITY-NEAR CTC Pilot Plant 1,094 FTE
NAT-TCR SkyPark 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 3018211 - Cys05 Sff 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dynamic Industries, Inc. - Coatings 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : ATG 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE All Native Managed Services 374 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hammonton Center 374 FTE
NAT-SIZE RK-896-Waverly ( RK-896 ) 374 FTE
NAT-SIZE HES Bossier City LA Industrial 374 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.