Commercial building construction general contractors · Missouri

Copeland Development & Construction Co., Inc.

Chillicothe, MO · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Copeland Development & Construction Co., Inc. runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Copeland Development & Construction Co., Inc.: 2.4 TCR = 81% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Copeland Development & Construction Co., Inc. safety composite

Copeland Development & Construction Co., Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2018→2019

Copeland Development & Construction Co., Inc. injury rate improved

Copeland Development & Construction Co., Inc.'s TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.7 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Chillicothe, MO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.4 · 81% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #57/122
  • PHOTO CK Construction Grou…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CK Construction Group, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Copeland Development & Construction Co., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Copeland Development & Construction Co., Inc. averages 2.4 TCR (81% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Copeland Development & Construction Co., Inc. TCR series: 2018=4.7 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Copeland Development & Construction Co., Inc. falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #57 safest of 122 Commercial building constructi employers in Missouri.

Copeland Development & Construction Co., Inc. (22 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Copeland Development & Construction Co., Inc.
Copeland Development & Construction Co., Inc. (22 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Copeland Development & Construction Co., Inc. has fewer employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MO · Chillicothe

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 36 employers in Chillicothe, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CK Construction Group, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shaw-Lundquist Associates, Inc. Nevada office 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BAY AREA BUILDERS, INC. 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kinley Contractors LLC D/B/A Kinley Corp of NY 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crown Plastics Inc 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heartland Ag - Missouri 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE 501 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Springfield - Install 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hedrick Medical Center 1,013 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 135 246 FTE
CITY-NEAR 135 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chillicothe-Global Plastics- Injection M - F051 182 FTE
NAT-TCR Distribution Center 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial Printing Services 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Junction WECO 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tops 272 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE North East Ambulance Service, Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1003 - BELFOR Pittsburgh PA 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1045 - BELFOR Richmond VA 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Island Cedar 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.