Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Michigan

Corby Energy Services, Inc.

Belleville, MI · ~278 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Corby Energy Services, Inc. runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Corby Energy Services, Inc.: 0.6 TCR = 20% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Corby Energy Services, Inc. safety composite

Corby Energy Services, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Corby Energy Services, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Corby Energy Services, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.2 from 0.3 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.3 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.6 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Belleville, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #13/54
  • PHOTO Spokane_Potelco
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~278 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spokane_Potelco (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Corby Energy Services, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Corby Energy Services, Inc. averages 0.6 TCR (20% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Corby Energy Services, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0.3 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.6 · 2020=1 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Corby Energy Services, Inc. falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 54 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Michigan.

Corby Energy Services, Inc. (278 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Corby Energy Services, Inc.
Corby Energy Services, Inc. (278 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Corby Energy Services, Inc. has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.3 2 0 0
2023 0.6 0.6 2 0 0
2022 0.6 0.6 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 3 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 2 0 0
2017 0.7 0.4 2 0 0
2016 0.3 0.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · MI · Belleville

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 70 employers in Belleville, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spokane_Potelco 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Veteran Power Infrastructure 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Veteran Pipeline Construction 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allied Power Services - Exelon, Peach Bottom Station 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cadillac Asphalt LLC 278 FTE
STATE-SIZE Summit Polymers Inc - Plant 18 278 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michigan Rubber Products 278 FTE
STATE-SIZE DBN Tool Die 278 FTE
CITY-NEAR NEAPCO Drivelines 640 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5481 361 FTE
CITY-NEAR LW Engineering Plant 2 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2872 300 FTE
NAT-TCR Clayton Valley Grocery Outlet 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Distributor Products 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Connecticut Housing Finance Authority 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR A & H Electric Co., LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE 121 - Chicago Bev 278 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2012 - Orange 278 FTE
NAT-SIZE USPL Nutritionals LLC 278 FTE
NAT-SIZE Principal Manufacturing Corporation 278 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.