Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · California

Veteran Pipeline Construction

Sacramento, CA · ~224 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Veteran Pipeline Construction runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Veteran Pipeline Construction: 0.6 TCR = 20% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Veteran Pipeline Construction safety composite

Veteran Pipeline Construction scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Veteran Pipeline Construction held a steady TCR band

Veteran Pipeline Construction's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.7 in 2023 to 0.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 0.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=0.7 · 2024=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/147
  • PHOTO Corby Energy Service…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~224 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corby Energy Services, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Veteran Pipeline Construction in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Veteran Pipeline Construction averages 0.6 TCR (20% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Veteran Pipeline Construction TCR series: 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Veteran Pipeline Construction falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 147 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in California.

Veteran Pipeline Construction (224 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Veteran Pipeline Construction
Veteran Pipeline Construction (224 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Veteran Pipeline Construction has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.7 0.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · CA · Sacramento

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corby Energy Services, Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spokane_Potelco 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Veteran Power Infrastructure 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allied Power Services - Exelon, Peach Bottom Station 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE TC Construction Company, Inc. 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1697_3366 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Production Plumbing Riverside 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE JBS Plastering, Inc 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR 8027657 Nike Shelby 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 99 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR D28 Syracuse 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Conveyor Installation, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Washington Duke Inn & Golf Club 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Immaculata University 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE 125 Business Park 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Common Links Construction, LLC 224 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.