Distribution of electric power · Georgia

Corporate Jackson EMC

Jefferson, GA · ~225 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Corporate Jackson EMC runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade B.

Corporate Jackson EMC: 0.7 TCR = 59% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Corporate Jackson EMC safety composite

Corporate Jackson EMC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2019→2024

Corporate Jackson EMC injury rate improved

Corporate Jackson EMC's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.1 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 1.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.1 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Jefferson, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 0.7 · 59% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/149
  • PHOTO Electric Distribution
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~225 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Electric Distribution (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Corporate Jackson EMC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Corporate Jackson EMC averages 0.7 TCR (59% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Corporate Jackson EMC TCR series: 2019=1.1 · 2020=1 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=1 · 2023=1 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Corporate Jackson EMC falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 149 Distribution of electric power employers in Georgia.

Corporate Jackson EMC (225 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Corporate Jackson EMC
Corporate Jackson EMC (225 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Corporate Jackson EMC has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2022 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2021 0.1 0.1 2 0 0
2020 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2019 1.1 0.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · GA · Jefferson

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 62 employers in Jefferson, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Electric Distribution 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rock Island Service Building 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Delivery Operations (Charleston) 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coahoma Electric Power Association - Coahoma 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brooks-Berry-Haynie & Associates 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE ELITE FLOORING AND DESIGN INC 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Polar Southern Bottling 225 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chatsworth Samples 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MGE5 2,098 FTE
CITY-NEAR HomeGoods Jefferson Distribution Center 1,274 FTE
CITY-NEAR H.G. Georgia Merchants, LLC 1,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : MGE5 1,248 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlas Copco IAS 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Indio CA Panel 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR PA - Nike CONNECT 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC. - 027 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Essentia Health Moose Lake Hospital 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peraton - USPS Central Repair Facility 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DWA6 225 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SWA2 225 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.