Hospitals, general medical and surgical · Connecticut

Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Institure

Uncasville, CT · ~49 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.7
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Institure runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade D.

Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Institure: 9.7 TCR = 129% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Institure safety composite

Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Institure scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Institure: 9.1 → 10.4 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 10.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.07× in 2017

Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Institure's TCR rose 1.3 from 9.1 in 2016 to 10.4 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Uncasville, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.7 · 129% of ind

  • DART 10.4 DART
  • RANK #82/86
  • PHOTO 2032-08181151
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2032-08181151 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Institure in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Institure averages 9.7 TCR (129% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Institure TCR series: 2016=9.1 · 2017=10.4 · BLS 7.5

Where Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Institure falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #82 safest of 86 Hospitals, general medical and employers in Connecticut.

Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Institure (49 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Institure
Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Institure (49 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Corrigan-Radgowski Correctional Institure has fewer employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 10.4 10.4 4 0 0
2016 9.1 9.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · CT · Uncasville

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 24 employers in Uncasville, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2032-08181151 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wayne Health Services & Supplies Inc 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR East Los Angeles Doctors Hospital 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR OLG Lafayette General Surgical Hospital 9.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Caldwell & Walsh Building Construction, Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highways/Roads - Operations 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Works 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highways & Bridges 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mohegan Tribal Gaming Authority 5,989 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mohegan Tribe of Indians of CT 620 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corrigan Radgowski Correction Center 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR Orchard Grove Specialty Care 145 FTE
NAT-TCR Acworth Center (Gawoo) 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Winfield (Alwin) 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Great Western Hollywood 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Langes Corners 9.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE AAA Worldwide Transportation 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Elk Rapids 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE AKA Tree Removal 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Mansfield LLC 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.