Welding positioners (i.e., jigs) manufacturing · Michigan

Corsair Engineering Inc.

Flint, MI · ~114 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Corsair Engineering Inc. runs at 248% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Welding positioners (i.e., jigs) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Corsair Engineering Inc.: 8.2 TCR = 248% of Welding positioners (i.e., jigs) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Corsair Engineering Inc. safety composite

Corsair Engineering Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.1

2018→2024

Corsair Engineering Inc. injury rate improved

Corsair Engineering Inc.'s TCR fell 15.1 from 19.2 in 2018 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 19.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=19.2 · 2019=12.1 · 2020=7.0 · 2021=6.0 · 2022=4.0 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Flint, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 248% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #105/131
  • PHOTO Greenville Tool & Die
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~114 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greenville Tool & Die (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Corsair Engineering Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Corsair Engineering Inc. averages 8.2 TCR (248% of the Welding positioners (i.e., jigs) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Corsair Engineering Inc. TCR series: 2018=19.2 · 2019=12.1 · 2020=7 · 2021=6 · 2022=4 · 2023=4.9 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Corsair Engineering Inc. falls in its industry

387 Welding positioners (i.e., jig establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #105 safest of 131 Welding positioners (i.e., jig employers in Michigan.

Corsair Engineering Inc. (114 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Corsair Engineering Inc.
Corsair Engineering Inc. (114 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Corsair Engineering Inc. has more employees than the Welding positioners (i.e., jigs) manufac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 1.0 4 0 0
2023 4.9 1.0 5 0 0
2022 4.0 2.0 4 0 0
2021 6.0 0.9 7 0 0
2020 7.0 3.0 3 4 0
2019 12.1 4.6 11 10 0
2018 19.2 4.2 16 16 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · MI · Flint

387 Welding positioners (i.e., jigs) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 260 employers in Flint, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greenville Tool & Die 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR DBN Tool Die 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nova-Tech @ 1702, 33/34 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Apple Steel Rule Die Co., Inc. 8.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Infrastructure Alternatives Inc 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE City of Detroit 114 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Boiler & Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 114 FTE
CITY-NEAR GM Flint Truck Assembly 5,164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Flint Assembly 3,920 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hurley Medical Center 2,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Flint 2,477 FTE
NAT-TCR Shelbyville Feed Mill 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Creedmoor Forest Products, Inc. 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Raley's 935-Facilities Maintenance 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Harrisburg 024 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Plaskolite Sheffield, LLC 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Stockton 2 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dallas County 114 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trego/Dugan Aviation, Inc Pit 114 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.