Skilled nursing facilities · Ohio

Coshocton Springs Health and Rehabilition Center

Coshocton, OH · ~84 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Coshocton Springs Health and Rehabilition Center runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Coshocton Springs Health and Rehabilition Center: 6.1 TCR = 94% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Coshocton Springs Health and Rehabilition Center safety composite

Coshocton Springs Health and Rehabilition Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2016→2017

Coshocton Springs Health and Rehabilition Center injury rate improved

Coshocton Springs Health and Rehabilition Center's TCR fell 5.9 from 9.1 in 2016 to 3.1 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 9.1 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.1 · 2017=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Coshocton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 6.1 · 94% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #505/1074
  • PHOTO Arbor Woods Health a…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~84 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Arbor Woods Health and Rehab (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Coshocton Springs Health and Rehabilition Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Coshocton Springs Health and Rehabilition Center averages 6.1 TCR (94% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Coshocton Springs Health and Rehabilition Center TCR series: 2016=9.1 · 2017=3.1 · BLS 6.5

Where Coshocton Springs Health and Rehabilition Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #505 safest of 1074 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Ohio.

Coshocton Springs Health and Rehabilition Center (84 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Coshocton Springs Health and Rehabilition Center
Coshocton Springs Health and Rehabilition Center (84 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Coshocton Springs Health and Rehabilition Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.1 1.6 2 0 0
2016 9.1 9.1 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · OH · Coshocton

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 36 employers in Coshocton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Arbor Woods Health and Rehab 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cherry Creek Retirement Village 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Manor - Mendota #108 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Johanna Shores 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Otterbein Clear Creek 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Pines Healthcare Center 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE FedEx 124 COMMERCE BLVD 84 FTE
STATE-SIZE Compco Columbiana 84 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kraft Heinz Company Coshocton 692 FTE
CITY-NEAR McWane Ductile - OH 504 FTE
CITY-NEAR McWane Ductile Ohio - 2266 South Sixth Street Coshocton Ohio 43812 421 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coshocton Works 404 FTE
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #3705 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mosaic Urbandale/Nevada 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Hampton Inn & Suites Portsmouth Downtown 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Compassionate Care Hospice of Bensalem 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE SCG Mechanical 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Walk Villa 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prostar, Inc 84 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Nichols Center 84 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.