Membership associations, civic or social · Colorado

Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center

Colorado Springs, CO · ~41 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center runs at 310% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Membership associations, civic or social workplace, earning a grade F.

Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center: 6.5 TCR = 310% of Membership associations, civic or social BLS 2.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center safety composite

Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.6

2017→2024

Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center injury rate improved

Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center's TCR fell 15.6 from 15.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 18.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=15.6 · 2018=18.2 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813410 · Colorado Springs, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.5 · 310% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/21
  • PHOTO Ridgecrest
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ridgecrest (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center averages 6.5 TCR (310% of the Membership associations, civic or social BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center TCR series: 2017=15.6 · 2018=18.2 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center falls in its industry

298 Membership associations, civic establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 21 Membership associations, civic employers in Colorado.

Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center (41 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center
Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center (41 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Cottonwood Creek Recreation Center has fewer employees than the Membership associations, civic or social median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.3 5.3 1 0 0
2018 18.2 9.1 2 0 0
2017 15.6 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813410 · CO · Colorado Springs

298 Membership associations, civic or social employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 832 employers in Colorado Springs, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ridgecrest 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Association Child Care 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR YMCA of Reading and Berks County 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minneapolis Club 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Colorado Beef 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilcrest Feedlot 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE TORTUGA AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Montrose Maintenance Center 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Colorado Hospital Memorial Central 3,102 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN4 2,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penrose Hospital 2,841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 05070001-050701 PENROSE HOSPITAL 2,391 FTE
NAT-TCR Arden Courts of Bingham Farms 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 1170 Pet74 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Portneuf Medical Center 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sika Corporation Lakewood 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Advanced Refrigeration Air Oldsmar 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Project Builders Inc 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inman Operations LLC 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pure Mechanical, LLC 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.