Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

Country Meadows of Lancaster

Lancaster, PA · ~87 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
23.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Country Meadows of Lancaster runs at 610% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Country Meadows of Lancaster: 23.2 TCR = 610% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Country Meadows of Lancaster safety composite

Country Meadows of Lancaster scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 23.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 41.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Country Meadows of Lancaster: 24.2 → 41.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 41.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.8× in 2020

Country Meadows of Lancaster's TCR rose 17.5 from 24.2 in 2016 to 41.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Lancaster, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 23.2 · 610% of ind

  • DART 41.7 DART
  • RANK #230/233
  • PHOTO Greenfield Estates
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greenfield Estates (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Country Meadows of Lancaster in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Country Meadows of Lancaster averages 23.2 TCR (610% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Country Meadows of Lancaster TCR series: 2016=24.2 · 2018=23.8 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=41.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Country Meadows of Lancaster falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #230 safest of 233 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Country Meadows of Lancaster (87 employees, TCR 23.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Country Meadows of Lancaster
Country Meadows of Lancaster (87 employees, TCR 23.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Country Meadows of Lancaster has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 41.7 41.7 5 21 0
2019 3.1 3.1 2 0 0
2018 23.8 22.4 16 1 0
2016 24.2 21.9 21 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Lancaster

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greenfield Estates 23.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR B-X Warwick LLC 23.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wesley Haven Villa 23.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Denver Tech Center 23.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Adams County Nursery Inc 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Handwerk Site Contractors 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1400 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE David M. Maines Associates, Inc. 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR Town of Plainfield 23.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gogebic County Road Commission 23.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0203 Oakland 23.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0544 New York 23.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Daubert Cromwell, LLC 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jefferson Facility 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gabriel Performance Products 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE OSC,Inc. 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.