Cold storage warehousing · Pennsylvania

Repack

Toughkenamon, PA · ~87 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

Repack runs at 358% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cold storage warehousing workplace, earning a grade F.

F
Failing Safety Record
20.8
avg TCR · per 100 workers
5.8
industry benchmark (BLS)
214
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares Repack's OSHA Total Case Rate of 20.8 to the Cold storage warehousing BLS benchmark of 5.8 (358% of benchmark) across 7 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.

Injury rate over time

Repack's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 5.8 industry benchmark.

020406080 2016201720182019202020212022 17.85.8 Industry benchmarkRepack TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 493120.

Where Repack falls in its industry

1,093 Cold storage warehousing establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 52 Cold storage warehousing employers in Pennsylvania.

Trend analysis for Repack

Between 2016 and 2022, Repack's Total Case Rate worsened from 12.8 to 17.8 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 39% increase across 6 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2016, at a TCR of 12.8, while 2021 saw the highest rate, at 34.5, a spread of 21.7 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 5 reporting years, Repack recorded 101 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 5-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 214 injuries, 28 illnesses shown on this page for Repack are sourced from its own 7 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 493120 - Cold storage warehousing.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2022)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

24 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 370,634 hours worked = 12.95 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Repack (this establishment) 20.77 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 7-year avg
Cold storage warehousing industry avg 5.80 BLS IIF, NAICS 493120
Pennsylvania state avg (all industries) 5.06 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Repack to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 17.8 12.9 11 22 0
2021 34.5 5.1 48 6 0
2020 18.8 6.8 22 0 0
2019 50.3 5.7 53 0 0
2018 68.4 10.3 60 0 0
2017 19.9 4.3 14 0 0
2016 12.8 4.3 6 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on Repack's reported OSHA injury record versus its Cold storage warehousing peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.

  • At 358% of the Cold storage warehousing benchmark, Repack reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Cold storage warehousing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Repack's safety grade?
Repack has a safety grade of F (Failing Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 20.8 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 5.8 for Cold storage warehousing.
How many injuries has Repack reported?
Repack has reported 214 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 7 years of OSHA data (2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Pennsylvania, and by nearby establishments in Toughkenamon - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Similar TCR (~20.8)

Similar size (~87 workers)

Nearby in Toughkenamon

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.