Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation · Minnesota

Courier Systems

Saint Paul, MN · ~16 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Courier Systems runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation workplace, earning a grade D.

Courier Systems: 8.0 TCR = 123% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Courier Systems safety composite

Courier Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Courier Systems: 4.5 → 16.0 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 16.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2021

Courier Systems's TCR rose 11.5 from 4.5 in 2019 to 16.0 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Saint Paul, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.0 · 123% of ind

  • DART 16.0 DART
  • RANK #55/113
  • PHOTO Amazon.com Services …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~16 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amazon.com Services LLC - HBF5 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Courier Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Courier Systems averages 8.0 TCR (123% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Courier Systems TCR series: 2019=4.5 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=16 · BLS 6.5

Where Courier Systems falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #55 safest of 113 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Minnesota.

Courier Systems (16 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Courier Systems
Courier Systems (16 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Courier Systems has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 16.0 16.0 3 0 0
2020 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2019 4.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · MN · Saint Paul

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 291 employers in Saint Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - HBF5 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - WID1 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 176010000 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 441300000 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Olivia - West 16 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACI Asphalt & Concrete LLC Roberts 16 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Resources Group 16 FTE
STATE-SIZE S.G.O. Roofing and Construction, LLC 16 FTE
CITY-NEAR HE-Midway Corporate Campus 2,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Public Safety 2,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Human Services, Central Office, Andersen, DC1 & Golden Rule 1,486 FTE
CITY-NEAR FV St Josephs Hospital 1,426 FTE
NAT-TCR UNR Oper 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pa061-Yapi-Franklin County Bh, Pa061 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Trinidad Inn Nursing Home 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ashland Place Health & Rehabilitation, LLC 8.0 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.