Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) · Texas

Courtyard Austin N

Austin, TX · ~28 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Courtyard Austin N runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) workplace, earning a grade C.

Courtyard Austin N: 3.6 TCR = 120% of Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Courtyard Austin N safety composite

Courtyard Austin N scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Courtyard Austin N held a steady TCR band

Courtyard Austin N's TCR held near 0.3 from 3.4 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.03× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.6 · 120% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #254/642
  • PHOTO THAWH - Holiday Inn …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: THAWH - Holiday Inn Express Tullahoma (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Courtyard Austin N in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Courtyard Austin N averages 3.6 TCR (120% of the Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Courtyard Austin N TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=3.7 · 2018=3.7 · BLS 3.0

Where Courtyard Austin N falls in its industry

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #254 safest of 642 Hotel management services (i.e employers in Texas.

Courtyard Austin N (28 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Courtyard Austin N
Courtyard Austin N (28 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Courtyard Austin N has fewer employees than the Hotel management services (i.e., providi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2017 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2016 3.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · TX · Austin

9,342 Hotel management services (i.e., providing management and operating staff to run hotel) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR THAWH - Holiday Inn Express Tullahoma 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hampton Inn 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fort Collins Hilton 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ballantyne Village Hotels DBA: AC Hotel Charlotte Ballantyne 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village farms of Fort Worth 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle X Land & Cattle Co., Ltd. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Happy Hen Harwood 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ten Hi Gin INC 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Valence Surface Technologies Eastman Operations 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Glenlake Terrace Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Michels Civil- Brownsville 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Martins Creek Generating Station 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Masda Mushroom LLC 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE RBC Lubron Bearing Systems, Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Newalta North Dakota Branch Office 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Linde - Gonzales 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.