Hotels · California

Courtyard Roseville Galleria Mall Creekside Ridge Drive

Roseville, CA · ~37 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Courtyard Roseville Galleria Mall Creekside Ridge Drive runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hotels workplace, earning a grade D.

Courtyard Roseville Galleria Mall Creekside Ridge Drive: 4.7 TCR = 156% of Hotels BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Courtyard Roseville Galleria Mall Creekside Ridge Drive safety composite

Courtyard Roseville Galleria Mall Creekside Ridge Drive scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Courtyard Roseville Galleria Mall Creekside Ridge Drive: 0.0 → 9.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 9.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1× in 2019

Courtyard Roseville Galleria Mall Creekside Ridge Drive's TCR rose 9.4 from 0.0 in 2018 to 9.4 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Roseville, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 156% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #272/1298
  • PHOTO Fairfield Inn & Suit…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fairfield Inn & Suites Fresno Clovis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Courtyard Roseville Galleria Mall Creekside Ridge Drive in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Courtyard Roseville Galleria Mall Creekside Ridge Drive averages 4.7 TCR (156% of the Hotels BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Courtyard Roseville Galleria Mall Creekside Ridge Drive TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=9.4 · BLS 3.0

Where Courtyard Roseville Galleria Mall Creekside Ridge Drive falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #272 safest of 1298 Hotels employers in California.

Courtyard Roseville Galleria Mall Creekside Ridge Drive (37 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Courtyard Roseville Galleria Mall Creekside Ridge Drive
Courtyard Roseville Galleria Mall Creekside Ridge Drive (37 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Courtyard Roseville Galleria Mall Creekside Ridge Drive has fewer employees than the Hotels median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 9.4 4.7 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · CA · Roseville

9,342 Hotels employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 311 employers in Roseville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fairfield Inn & Suites Fresno Clovis 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SLS Brickell 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hampton Inn - New Smyrna Beach 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LQ2032 Fort Lauderdale - Northeast 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Base Framing Inc. 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dils Roofing 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE VALLEY WELDING & MACHINE WORKS 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE WCA Sacramento 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-02121801 4,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30003) 4,383 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0206-02621801 3,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Roseville Medical Center (110-5001) 3,162 FTE
NAT-TCR Compression Technologies and Services : MFG-West Chester, PA-USA 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hospital Couriers Florida (West) 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0020 1011 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Marriott Richmond 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fire & Marine Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doughty Valley Factory Store Office 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aloft Ballantyne 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wheelabrator McKay Bay Inc. 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.