Solid waste collection · Maryland

Covanta Montgomery, Inc. - Transfer Station

Derwood, MD · ~63 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Covanta Montgomery, Inc. - Transfer Station runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Solid waste collection workplace, earning a grade C.

Covanta Montgomery, Inc. - Transfer Station: 2.8 TCR = 108% of Solid waste collection BLS 2.6 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Covanta Montgomery, Inc. - Transfer Station safety composite

Covanta Montgomery, Inc. - Transfer Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2019

Covanta Montgomery, Inc. - Transfer Station injury rate improved

Covanta Montgomery, Inc. - Transfer Station's TCR fell 1.5 from 4.2 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562111 · Derwood, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 108% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/33
  • PHOTO Waste Industries Fay…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~63 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Waste Industries Fayetteville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Covanta Montgomery, Inc. - Transfer Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Covanta Montgomery, Inc. - Transfer Station averages 2.8 TCR (108% of the Solid waste collection BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Covanta Montgomery, Inc. - Transfer Station TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=1.4 · 2018=2.8 · 2019=2.7 · BLS 2.6

Where Covanta Montgomery, Inc. - Transfer Station falls in its industry

2,322 Solid waste collection establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 33 Solid waste collection employers in Maryland.

Covanta Montgomery, Inc. - Transfer Station (63 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Covanta Montgomery, Inc. - Transfer Station
Covanta Montgomery, Inc. - Transfer Station (63 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 5.1

Covanta Montgomery, Inc. - Transfer Station has more employees than the Solid waste collection median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.7 0.0 1 1 0
2018 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2017 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 4.2 1.4 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562111 · MD · Derwood

2,322 Solid waste collection employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 10 employers in Derwood, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Waste Industries Fayetteville 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR S07061 - Phoenix Hauling - Butterfield Hauling 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR S04819 - Refuse, Inc - Sage Transfer Station 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conwaste Comercial Toa Baja 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE DPL-Centreville 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chesapeake Utilities Corporation - Beaver Run 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Viskon-Aire Coporation 63 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lighting Retrofit International 63 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Pool Service 466 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Options Rockville MD 235 FTE
CITY-NEAR GIANT 161 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR 100161 84 FTE
NAT-TCR Rand Wv Depot 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Best Supply Eastlake 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlas Metal & Iron Corporation 1100 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Nashville/Hendersonville (HP) 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE MRP Beavercreek 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Pallets, Inc. 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shell Rock Healthcare 63 FTE
NAT-SIZE WCA San Diego 63 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.