Continuing care retirement communities · California

Covenant Living at Mount Miguel

Spring Valley, CA · ~230 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Covenant Living at Mount Miguel runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

Covenant Living at Mount Miguel: 6.3 TCR = 165% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Covenant Living at Mount Miguel safety composite

Covenant Living at Mount Miguel scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Covenant Living at Mount Miguel: 3.9 → 7.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.89× in 2024

Covenant Living at Mount Miguel's TCR rose 3.4 from 3.9 in 2019 to 7.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Spring Valley, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 165% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #61/216
  • PHOTO River Park Senior Li…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 65 inj
  • SIZE ~230 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: River Park Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Covenant Living at Mount Miguel in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Covenant Living at Mount Miguel averages 6.3 TCR (165% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Covenant Living at Mount Miguel TCR series: 2019=3.9 · 2020=8.3 · 2021=7.7 · 2022=5.9 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=7.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Covenant Living at Mount Miguel falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 216 Continuing care retirement com employers in California.

Covenant Living at Mount Miguel (230 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Covenant Living at Mount Miguel
Covenant Living at Mount Miguel (230 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Covenant Living at Mount Miguel has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.3 5.6 12 1 0
2023 4.5 4.5 8 0 0
2022 5.9 5.9 11 0 0
2021 7.7 5.5 11 3 0
2020 8.3 3.1 16 0 0
2019 3.9 3.9 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Spring Valley

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 56 employers in Spring Valley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR River Park Senior Living 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hearth on James 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit Place 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LEGACY VILLAGE OF PROVO 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE BETTERAVIA FARMS 230 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amezcua Ag Inc 230 FTE
STATE-SIZE GREEN AG MANAGEMENT, LLC 230 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tierra Blanca FLC, Inc 230 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 368 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR MOUNT MIGUEL COVENANT VILLAGE 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Casper Company 180 FTE
CITY-NEAR McGrath Family YMCA 162 FTE
NAT-TCR Arbor Landing at Surfside 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Servpro of Effingham Mattoon Charleston 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1303 Fairbanks 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Martin'S Food Markets 6102 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Nello Operating Co LLC 230 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Heating Cooling & Plumbing 230 FTE
NAT-SIZE NPXONE 230 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wirerope Works Inc. 230 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.