Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft engines and engine parts · Oklahoma

Covington Aircraft Radial Division

Okmulgee, OK · ~25 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Covington Aircraft Radial Division runs at 74% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft engines and engine parts workplace, earning a grade B.

Covington Aircraft Radial Division: 2.5 TCR = 74% of Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft engines and engine parts BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Covington Aircraft Radial Division safety composite

Covington Aircraft Radial Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 32%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Covington Aircraft Radial Division held a steady TCR band

Covington Aircraft Radial Division's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=14.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Okmulgee, OK AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 74% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO MT R&O, LLC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MT R&O, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Covington Aircraft Radial Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Covington Aircraft Radial Division averages 2.5 TCR (74% of the Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft engines and engine parts BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Covington Aircraft Radial Division TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=14.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Covington Aircraft Radial Division falls in its industry

366 Developing and producing proto establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Developing and producing proto employers in Oklahoma.

Covington Aircraft Radial Division (25 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Covington Aircraft Radial Division
Covington Aircraft Radial Division (25 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Covington Aircraft Radial Division has fewer employees than the Developing and producing prototypes for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 14.7 3.7 3 1 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · OK · Okmulgee

366 Developing and producing prototypes for aircraft engines and engine parts employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 32 employers in Okmulgee, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MT R&O, LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Power Flow Systems 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Enginetics Corporation 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Services : ACSC, OH 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ovintiv USA Inc. - Scoop Office 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE McAlester Office 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ringwood Field Office 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Quintin Little Company Inc 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 121 292 FTE
CITY-NEAR 121 286 FTE
CITY-NEAR CP Kelco OKM 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medical Center 206 FTE
NAT-TCR Mardant Home Office 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR KDC Body Shop Inc 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SCI Moline, LLC 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Summit Health and Rehabilitation Center 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bulman Products Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE NEFCO-Detroit 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cape Hatteras Electric Cooperative 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coke Capital Kresson St. 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.