Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · Minnesota

CPI Card Group MN - Prepaid

Roseville, MN · ~365 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CPI Card Group MN - Prepaid runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

CPI Card Group MN - Prepaid: 0.9 TCR = 28% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CPI Card Group MN - Prepaid safety composite

CPI Card Group MN - Prepaid scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

CPI Card Group MN - Prepaid held a steady TCR band

CPI Card Group MN - Prepaid's TCR held near 0.0 from 1.0 in 2019 to 0.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=1.0 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Roseville, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #7/89
  • PHOTO West Contract Manufa…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~365 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: West Contract Manufacturing Grand Rapids (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

CPI Card Group MN - Prepaid in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CPI Card Group MN - Prepaid averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CPI Card Group MN - Prepaid TCR series: 2019=1 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where CPI Card Group MN - Prepaid falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 89 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in Minnesota.

CPI Card Group MN - Prepaid (365 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate CPI Card Group MN - Prepaid
CPI Card Group MN - Prepaid (365 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

CPI Card Group MN - Prepaid has more employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.9 0.7 4 0 0
2021 1.2 0.7 5 0 0
2020 0.6 0.3 2 0 0
2019 1.0 1.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · MN · Roseville

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 239 employers in Roseville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR West Contract Manufacturing Grand Rapids 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delmar Company 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Entegris - Chaska 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carrollton 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rice Street Service Center 365 FTE
STATE-SIZE ANAGRAM MANUFACTURING - MN 365 FTE
STATE-SIZE McNeilus Steel Inc. 365 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1654 365 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro District 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR Park Dental/The Dental Specialist 1,141 FTE
CITY-NEAR Veritas Technologies LLC - Roseville 777 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2101 - Roseville T1 509 FTE
NAT-TCR HNTNWVUV 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Raba Kistner, Inc - Austin 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Justice Courts 1-6 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1086 - Idaho Falls 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3495-11DG081 365 FTE
NAT-SIZE 104096 - Jackson Generation 365 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meadowview Regional Medical Center 365 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wegmans Germantown 056 365 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.