Posters commercial printing (except screen) without publishing · Montana

Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA

Great Falls, MT · ~44 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Posters commercial printing (except screen) without publishing workplace, earning a grade C.

Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA: 2.7 TCR = 81% of Posters commercial printing (except screen) without publishing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA safety composite

Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−139.7

2017→2021

Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA injury rate improved

Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA's TCR fell 139.7 from 142.9 in 2017 to 3.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 142.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=142.9 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=3.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Great Falls, MT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 81% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Yorke
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Yorke (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA averages 2.7 TCR (81% of the Posters commercial printing (except screen) without publishing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA TCR series: 2017=142.9 · 2018=4.9 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=3.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA falls in its industry

2,001 Posters commercial printing (e establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Posters commercial printing (e employers in Montana.

Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA (44 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA
Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA (44 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA has fewer employees than the Posters commercial printing (except scre median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.5 0.0 2 0 0
2018 4.9 4.9 1 1 0
2017 142.9 0.0 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MT · Great Falls

2,001 Posters commercial printing (except screen) without publishing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 121 employers in Great Falls, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Yorke 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR D&K Printing Inc 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR KB Publishing Inc, 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rotary Forms Press Inc 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buffalo Restoration, Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillips 66 Billings MT 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE DFA FLUID - BILLINGS MT 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bridger Steel - Belgrade 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2455 388 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7199 341 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2455 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR 7199 301 FTE
NAT-TCR Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR BT Gulfport 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Syncot South 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR F&M Equipment 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Office 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bando USA Inc. Itasca 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tacoma Terminal 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.