Homes for the elderly with nursing care · Wisconsin

Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare

Clinton, WI · ~71 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade A.

Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare: 2.7 TCR = 41% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare safety composite

Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare: 2.0 → 4.2 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.55× in 2021

Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare's TCR rose 2.1 from 2.0 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Clinton, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.7 · 41% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK #49/355
  • PHOTO Memorial Heights Nur…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Memorial Heights Nursing Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare averages 2.7 TCR (41% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare TCR series: 2016=2 · 2018=1.9 · 2021=4.2 · BLS 6.5

Where Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #49 safest of 355 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in Wisconsin.

Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare (71 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare
Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare (71 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Alden Meadow Park Rehab and Healthcare has fewer employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.2 4.2 1 1 0
2018 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2016 2.0 2.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · WI · Clinton

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 13 employers in Clinton, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Memorial Heights Nursing Center 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Solaris Healthcare Imperial 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Life care center of elyria 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chippewa Manor Nursing and Rehabilitation Corp 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Renk Seed Company 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Integrated Process Engineers & Constructors, Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Samuels Group, Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rural Masonry Co Inc 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scot Forge - Clinton 147 FTE
CITY-NEAR Durst 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meadow Park and Health Care Center 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR JAKES ELECTRIC, LLC 82 FTE
NAT-TCR Crago, Inc. dba Printing Center USA 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR BT Gulfport 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Syncot South 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR F&M Equipment 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aiken Pest Control, Inc 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Robert Bosch Battery Systyems LLC 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sheriff'S Main Office 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mt. Arlington Senior Living 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.